Comments on: John Loftus confesses intellectual guilt

By: Kathleen

Kathleen — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:04:34 +0000

Thank you. *bows* Perhaps my silly linguistic indulgence wasn’t as outrageously and glaringly preposterous as I thought.

By: Joshua Blanchard

Joshua Blanchard — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:31:06 +0000

Kathleen, I’m only now noticing the amazing alliteration in the sentence, “I could even envision enhanced eminence exacerbating the already execrable essence of such an endeavour were it effected by an ‘expert’.”

By: Kathleen

Kathleen — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:11:22 +0000

Given the astronomic degree of obnoxiousness such a project would almost certainly attain, I am not sure whether your lack of status could make a discernable difference. I could even envision enhanced eminence exacerbating the already execrable essence of such an endeavour were it effected by an ‘expert’.

But I do not think I can trust my intutions: my powers of imagination stagger. I will defer to experts in obnoxiousness such as yourself.

By: Joshua Blanchard

Joshua Blanchard — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:20:06 +0000

Yes, naturally these views wouldn’t apply to blogs…

Actually I’m not sure how I feel about blogs. If I tried to post a comprehensive Christian apologetic, claiming all the while that only the unreasonable could not be changed by it, that might be especially obnoxious due to my lack of status.

By: Kathleen

Kathleen — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:28:48 +0000

Oops, forgot an important word. Please add “know” after “need to”: “I naturally assume you exempt the authors of blogs from the need to KNOW something about a topic prior to publishing their opinions about it on their website.”

Serves me right!